Analisis Putusan Hakim No. 180/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sda terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/researchjet.v2i4.9Keywords:
judge's decision, domestic violenceAbstract
Victims of domestic violence are mostly experienced by women and must get protection from society and the state in order to avoid and be free from violence and torture that has degraded the degree and dignity of human beings. Domestic violence, especially the atrocities committed by partners against their partners, leads not only to real torture but also to mental misery. Therefore, victims of domestic violence must receive maximum protection. The purpose of this study is to find out the analysis of the judge's decision No.180/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sda. This type of research is a normative juridical research using a case approach problem approach. Sources of legal materials obtained in this study are primary and secondary sources of law. While the analysis of legal materials used in this study is deductive analysis because deductive analysis is a technique of analyzing legal materials by collecting facts that are packaged into theories. The results of the analysis of the judge's decision No.180/Pid.Sus/2020 PN. SDA against victims of criminal acts of domestic violence shows that the judge in imposing criminal sanctions on the defendant has been in accordance with the applicable law, namely Article 44 paragraph 1 of the Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence. However, there was injustice. The judge tried the decision no. 180/Pid.Sus/2020 PN. Sda because what was handed down to the defendant was 3 years in prison. In the judge's decision there is injustice because in Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Law. RI. Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence has regulated that criminal acts of domestic violence must be sentenced to a maximum of 5 (five) years in prison and a fine of Rp. 15,000,000.
References
Achmad, M. F. N. d. Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Pustaka Belajar.
Al-Anizi, A. A. (2020). The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Judicial Decisions in Domestic Violence Cases. Journal of Family Violence, 35(7), 1023–1032.
Amalia, M. (2011). Kekerasan Perempuan Dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Sosiokultural. Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, 25(2), 1–13.
Anshori. (2020). Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekrasan Fisik Dalam Rumah Tangga (Studi Putusan Nomor: 80/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Liw). Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(2), 25–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v19i1.7246
Ariawan, I. G. K. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Kertha Widya Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 21–30.
Aristoteles. (2004). Sebuah “Kitab Suci Etika” Nicomachean Ethics. Teraju Mizan.
Bettinger-Lopez, C., & Bro, A. (2020). A double pandemic: Domestic violence in the age of COVID-19. Council on Foreign Relations, 13, 1–7.
Ibrahim, J. (2007). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (cet. III). Bayumedia Publishing.
Jaftoran, F. M. J. A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Sebagai Korban Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Ditinjau Dari UU No. 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan KDRT. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 2(2), 74–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v3i2.2220
Kourti, A., Stavridou, A., Panagouli, E., Psaltopoulou, T., Spiliopoulou, C., Tsolia, M., Sergentanis, T. N., & Tsitsika, A. (2023). Domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 719–745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211038690
Laminantang, P. (2011). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Leslie, E., & Wilson, R. (2020). Sheltering in place and domestic violence: Evidence from calls for service during COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 189, 104241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104241
Lloyd, M. (2018). Domestic violence and education: Examining the impact of domestic violence on young children, children, and young people and the potential role of schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02094
Malathesh, B. C., Das, S., Chatterjee, S. S., & others. (2020). COVID-19 and domestic violence against women. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 102227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102227
Mshweshwe, L. (2020). Understanding domestic violence: masculinity, culture, traditions. Heliyon, 6(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05334
Muchtar, H. (2015). Analisis Yuridis Normatif Sinkronisasi Peraturan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia. Humanis, 14(1), 80–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jh.v14i1.5405
Mukhtar. (2013). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. GP. Press Group.
Rauf, M. D. M. A. A. (2021). Judicial Responses to Domestic Violence in Indonesia: A Case Study. Asian Journal of Criminology, 16(2), 121–135.
Rhiti, H. (2015). Filsafat Hukum Edisi Lengkap (Dari Klasik ke Postmodernisme). Universitas Atma Jaya.
Santoso, M. A. (2014). Hukum, Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Kencana.
Sari, N. A. R., Sulistyowati, M. S., & Dewi, D. R. A. (2021). The Role of Cultural Factors in Judicial Decisions on Domestic Violence Cases: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and the United States. Violence Against Women, 27(11), 1444–1460.
Suheri, A. (2018). Wujud Keadilan Dalam Masyarakat Di Tinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Morality, 4(1), 60–68.
Zulkarnain, I. (2018). TEORI KEADILAN: “PENGARUH PEMIKIRAN ETIKA ARISTOTELES KEPADA SISTEM ETIKA IBN MISKAWAIH.” Jurnal Madani, 1(1), 144–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33753/madani.v1i1.8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lutfiah Fauzi, Emy Rosnawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
